PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and Capital Power Corporation (CPX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQ.TO achieves a 44.04% return, which is significantly higher than CPX.TO's 24.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ.TO has underperformed CPX.TO with an annualized return of 18.64%, while CPX.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.


CNQ.TO

1D
1.47%
1M
2.49%
YTD
44.04%
6M
42.39%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
30.24%
10Y*
18.64%

CPX.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
10.27%
YTD
24.34%
6M
20.09%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
22.50%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
44.04%10.42%7.11%21.06%49.65%82.41%-20.75%32.78%-24.17%7.75%
CPX.TO
Capital Power Corporation
24.34%-3.64%77.90%-13.28%23.39%18.96%8.92%37.12%16.05%12.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQ.TO and CPX.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2009

0.17

The correlation between CNQ.TO and CPX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNQ.TO:

CA$139.10B

CPX.TO:

CA$11.28B

EPS

CNQ.TO:

CA$4.65

CPX.TO:

CA$0.16

PE Ratio

CNQ.TO:

14.27

CPX.TO:

464.56

PEG Ratio

CNQ.TO:

0.69

CPX.TO:

2.94

PS Ratio

CNQ.TO:

3.50

CPX.TO:

3.08

PB Ratio

CNQ.TO:

3.12

CPX.TO:

2.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNQ.TO:

CA$39.61B

CPX.TO:

CA$3.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNQ.TO:

CA$12.42B

CPX.TO:

-CA$141.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

CNQ.TO:

CA$17.78B

CPX.TO:

CA$619.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQ.TO
CNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CPX.TO
CPX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CPX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CPX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and Capital Power Corporation (CPX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNQ.TOCPX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.15

+1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

1.58

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.53

+2.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.58

3.02

+7.56

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the CPX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ.TO and CPX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNQ.TOCPX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.15

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.78

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.81

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.58

+0.06

Drawdowns

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.20%, which is greater than CPX.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ.TO and CPX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQ.TOCPX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.20%

-47.38%

-28.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-21.94%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.11%

-33.75%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-33.75%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.20%

-47.38%

-28.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-0.06%

-4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-9.58%

-9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

11.10%

-5.27%

Volatility

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to Capital Power Corporation (CPX.TO) at 7.55%. This indicates that CNQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNQ.TOCPX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.61%

7.55%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.71%

21.48%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.67%

29.41%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.46%

24.66%

+5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.03%

25.92%

+12.11%

Dividends

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than CPX.TO's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.60%5.06%4.82%4.26%6.12%3.66%5.44%3.50%3.98%2.40%2.15%3.02%
CPX.TO
Capital Power Corporation
3.78%4.59%3.98%6.32%4.87%5.38%5.68%5.40%6.51%6.60%6.50%7.93%

Financials

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Capital Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
10.81B
1.08B
(CNQ.TO) Total Revenue
(CPX.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

CNQ.TO vs. CPX.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Capital Power Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
32.1%
16.1%
Portfolio components
CNQ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 10.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

CPX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Power Corporation reported a gross profit of 173.00M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.1%.

CNQ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

CPX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Power Corporation reported an operating income of 118.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

CNQ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

CPX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Power Corporation reported a net income of 15.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNQ.TO and CPX.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNQ.TO and CPX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer