CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Collective Mining Ltd (CNL.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO).
Performance
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNL.TO Collective Mining Ltd | 22.15% | 235.01% | 41.13% | 65.88% | -13.56% | 207.29% | 50.00% | -68.00% |
SRU-UN.TO SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust | 4.63% | 13.10% | 6.13% | 0.16% | -11.27% | 48.64% | -19.65% | 1.79% |
Fundamentals
CNL.TO:
CA$2.07B
SRU-UN.TO:
CA$4.85B
CNL.TO:
-CA$0.56
SRU-UN.TO:
CA$1.44
CNL.TO:
34.08
SRU-UN.TO:
0.93
CNL.TO:
CA$0.00
SRU-UN.TO:
CA$927.28M
CNL.TO:
-CA$53.67K
SRU-UN.TO:
CA$564.58M
CNL.TO:
-CA$44.95M
SRU-UN.TO:
CA$486.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNL.TO achieves a 22.15% return, which is significantly higher than SRU-UN.TO's 4.63% return.
CNL.TO
- 1D
- 9.55%
- 1M
- -14.01%
- YTD
- 22.15%
- 6M
- 20.88%
- 1Y
- 94.66%
- 3Y*
- 80.56%
- 5Y*
- 91.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SRU-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNL.TO
SRU-UN.TO
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Collective Mining Ltd (CNL.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNL.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 0.97 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 1.42 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.06 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.59 | 5.59 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNL.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 0.97 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.43 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.35 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNL.TO and SRU-UN.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRU-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNL.TO Collective Mining Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRU-UN.TO SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.36% | 7.18% | 7.56% | 7.42% | 6.90% | 5.74% | 8.01% | 5.81% | 5.72% | 5.55% | 5.17% | 5.34% |
Drawdowns
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNL.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, which is greater than SRU-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNL.TO and SRU-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNL.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.14% | -68.25% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.00% | -6.39% | -25.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.43% | -28.89% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.01% | -4.64% | -9.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -11.06% | -21.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.09% | 2.36% | +12.73% |
Volatility
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Collective Mining Ltd (CNL.TO) has a higher volatility of 26.35% compared to SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) at 3.41%. This indicates that CNL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRU-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNL.TO | SRU-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.35% | 3.41% | +22.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.43% | 8.39% | +43.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.69% | 12.78% | +51.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.93% | 16.23% | +95.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.66% | 21.57% | +79.09% |
Financials
CNL.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Collective Mining Ltd and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities