CNL.TO vs. CNL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Collective Mining Ltd (CNL.TO) and Collective Mining Ltd (CNL).

Performance

CNL.TO vs. CNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Collective Mining Ltd (CNL.TO) and Collective Mining Ltd (CNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNL.TO vs. CNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CNL.TO Collective Mining Ltd	26.80%	235.01%	57.11%
CNL Collective Mining Ltd	28.13%	234.63%	63.77%

Different Trading Currencies

CNL.TO is traded in CAD, while CNL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

EPS CNL.TO : -CA$0.56 CNL : -$0.91
Total Revenue (TTM) CNL.TO : CA$0.00 CNL : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) CNL.TO : -CA$53.67K CNL : -$97.50K
EBITDA (TTM) CNL.TO : -CA$44.95M CNL : -$48.35M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CNL.TO having a 26.80% return and CNL slightly higher at 28.13%.

CNL.TO

• 1D: 3.81%
• 1M: -8.61%
• YTD: 26.80%
• 6M: 23.65%
• 1Y: 104.02%
• 3Y*: 82.82%
• 5Y*: 92.48%
• 10Y*: —

CNL

• 1D: 4.68%
• 1M: -7.72%
• YTD: 28.13%
• 6M: 24.80%
• 1Y: 106.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CNL.TO vs. CNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNL.TO

CNL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
CNL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CNL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CNL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CNL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CNL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

CNL

CNL Risk / Return Rank: 82
CNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CNL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CNL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNL.TO vs. CNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Collective Mining Ltd (CNL.TO) and Collective Mining Ltd (CNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNL.TO	CNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.59	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.13	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.26	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	3.23	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	6.98	-0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNL.TO vs. CNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the CNL Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNL.TO and CNL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNL.TO	CNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.59	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	3.45	-3.02

Correlation

The correlation between CNL.TO and CNL is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CNL.TO vs. CNL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNL.TO nor CNL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CNL.TO vs. CNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNL.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, which is greater than CNL's maximum drawdown of -32.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNL.TO and CNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNL.TO	CNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.14%	-33.29%	-43.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.00%	-33.29%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.74%	-11.08%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.65%	-9.17%	-23.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.10%	15.42%	-0.32%

Volatility

CNL.TO vs. CNL - Volatility Comparison

Collective Mining Ltd (CNL.TO) and Collective Mining Ltd (CNL) have volatilities of 25.49% and 26.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNL.TO	CNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.49%	26.67%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.55%	53.09%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.75%	67.30%	-2.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.94%	63.49%	+48.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.64%	63.49%	+37.15%

Financials