CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CNKY.L (iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)) and TPXG.L (Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNKY.L returned 12.16%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for TPXG.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNKY.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TPXG.L.

Performance

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNKY.L achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly higher than TPXG.L's 14.95% return.

CNKY.L

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 7.58%
• YTD: 31.80%
• 6M: 28.96%
• 1Y: 64.51%
• 3Y*: 20.46%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 12.70%

TPXG.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 14.60%
• 1Y: 33.07%
• 3Y*: 16.91%
• 5Y*: 10.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNKY.L iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)	31.80%	20.64%	9.15%	15.02%	-10.53%	-4.18%	21.18%	16.38%	-3.99%	10.32%
TPXG.L Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY	14.95%	18.33%	8.12%	13.45%	-6.05%	2.07%	7.12%	8.68%	-2.90%	7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CNKY.L and TPXG.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.42

Over the past year, CNKY.L and TPXG.L have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNKY.L	TPXG.L
Technology	32.6%	10.7%
Industrials	18.8%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	16.4%	19.2%
Communication Services	14.0%	7.4%
Healthcare	6.4%	15.1%
Basic Materials	4.1%	4.1%
Financial Services	3.1%	20.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.5%
Energy	0.3%	3.7%
Utilities	0.2%	3.0%

Return for Risk

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNKY.L

CNKY.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CNKY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CNKY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CNKY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CNKY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

TPXG.L

TPXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
TPXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TPXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
TPXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TPXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNKY.L	TPXG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	1.84	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	2.61	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.35	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.76	3.01	+1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.40	9.66	+4.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNKY.L and TPXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNKY.L	TPXG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81	1.84	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.98	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.87	-0.20

Drawdowns

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNKY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, roughly equal to the maximum TPXG.L drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNKY.L and TPXG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNKY.L	TPXG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-22.96%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.32%	-10.57%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.39%	-12.96%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.83%	-18.00%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-0.19%	-1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-4.42%	-2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.41%	3.30%	+1.11%

Volatility

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that CNKY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNKY.L	TPXG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	3.74%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.88%	14.16%	+3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.59%	17.29%	+5.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.76%	20.10%	-2.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	24.48%	-7.26%

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNKY.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than TPXG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNKY.L vs. TPXG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNKY.L nor TPXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNKY.L and TPXG.L in my portfolio?

CNKY.L and TPXG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNKY.L or TPXG.L?

On fees, TPXG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNKY.L or TPXG.L?

TPXG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CNKY.L.

What is the main difference between CNKY.L and TPXG.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CNKY.L and 0.20% for TPXG.L.