PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNI vs. AAXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNI vs. AAXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNI achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly lower than AAXJ's 25.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CNI has underperformed AAXJ with an annualized return of 9.38%, while AAXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.


CNI

1D
0.67%
1M
1.13%
YTD
17.61%
6M
17.72%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
1.46%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
9.38%

AAXJ

1D
-6.03%
1M
2.68%
YTD
25.79%
6M
26.97%
1Y
47.85%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNI vs. AAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
17.61%-0.10%-17.51%7.84%-1.86%13.70%23.66%24.26%-8.49%25.03%
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF
25.79%31.53%10.41%4.79%-20.35%-5.73%23.35%17.93%-15.04%41.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CNI and AAXJ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2008

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between CNI and AAXJ has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNI vs. AAXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNI
CNI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AAXJ
AAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNI vs. AAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNIAAXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.39

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

3.52

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

12.86

-10.88

CNI vs. AAXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNI Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the AAXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNI and AAXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNI vs. AAXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNI drawdown since its inception was -46.66%, smaller than the maximum AAXJ drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNI and AAXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNIAAXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.66%

-49.37%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-13.66%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-19.74%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-40.64%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.15%

-44.52%

+15.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.78%

-6.03%

-2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-14.00%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

3.73%

+3.96%

Volatility

CNI vs. AAXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) is 5.36%, while iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a volatility of 13.43%. This indicates that CNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNIAAXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

13.43%

-8.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.48%

21.20%

-3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

23.39%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

20.63%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.66%

20.51%

+2.15%

Dividends

CNI vs. AAXJ - Dividend Comparison

CNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than AAXJ's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF
1.32%1.81%1.86%1.95%1.74%2.21%1.06%1.83%2.10%1.99%1.77%2.44%
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
2.27%2.58%2.43%1.85%1.41%1.61%1.59%1.79%2.01%2.00%2.23%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNI and AAXJ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAXJ has higher volatility (13.43%) compared to CNI (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNI dropped -46.66% vs AAXJ's -49.37%.

AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNI and AAXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer