CNEQ vs. FMTM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CNEQ (Alger Concentrated Equity ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CNEQ returned 39.65% vs 59.67% for FMTM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNEQ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNEQ achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 30.28% return.

CNEQ

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 16.03%
• 6M: 13.52%
• 1Y: 39.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMTM

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 4.11%
• YTD: 30.28%
• 6M: 27.32%
• 1Y: 59.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	16.03%	45.44%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	30.28%	28.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CNEQ and FMTM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.59

The correlation between CNEQ and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CNEQ vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNEQ

CNEQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
CNEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CNEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CNEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CNEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
CNEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 84
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNEQ	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.47	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.04	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	4.95	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	18.81	-12.41

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNEQ and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNEQ and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNEQ	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.58%	-12.12%	-15.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	-12.12%	-7.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-3.61%	-1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-1.91%	-2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.21%	3.18%	+3.03%

Volatility

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) have volatilities of 9.80% and 9.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNEQ	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.80%	9.38%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.63%	18.88%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.07%	24.26%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	23.64%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.97%	23.64%	+3.33%

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNEQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNEQ vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

CNEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than FMTM's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	0.45%	0.52%	0.16%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNEQ and FMTM in my portfolio?

CNEQ and FMTM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNEQ or FMTM?

CNEQ has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to FMTM (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNEQ dropped -27.58% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

Which ETF is better, CNEQ or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 59.67% vs 39.65% for CNEQ. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNEQ or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 59.67% return vs 39.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNEQ or FMTM?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CNEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNEQ or FMTM?

CNEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.23% for FMTM.

What is the main difference between CNEQ and FMTM?

CNEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CNEQ and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.