CNEQ vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CNEQ (Alger Concentrated Equity ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CNEQ returned 39.65% vs 28.98% for FBCG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNEQ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNEQ achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 10.18% return.

CNEQ

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 16.03%
• 6M: 13.52%
• 1Y: 39.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 6M: 8.78%
• 1Y: 28.98%
• 3Y*: 27.62%
• 5Y*: 13.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	16.03%	33.61%	29.82%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	10.18%	18.60%	22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CNEQ and FBCG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2024	0.93

The correlation between CNEQ and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNEQ	FBCG
Technology	47.4%	48.9%
Communication Services	16.8%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	17.2%
Utilities	6.6%	0.5%
Industrials	6.1%	5.6%
Healthcare	4.3%	5.6%
Financial Services	1.6%	2.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.3%
Energy	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

CNEQ vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNEQ

CNEQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
CNEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CNEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CNEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CNEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
CNEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 45
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNEQ	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.47	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.03	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	1.92	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	7.20	-0.80

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNEQ and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNEQ and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNEQ	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.58%	-43.56%	+15.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	-15.17%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-5.67%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-11.42%	+6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.21%	4.04%	+2.17%

Volatility

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 8.27%. This indicates that CNEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNEQ	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.80%	8.27%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.63%	15.44%	+3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.07%	19.84%	+4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	26.00%	+0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.97%	25.79%	+1.18%

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNEQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNEQ vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

CNEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	0.45%	0.52%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNEQ and FBCG in my portfolio?

CNEQ and FBCG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNEQ or FBCG?

CNEQ has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to FBCG (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNEQ dropped -27.58% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, CNEQ or FBCG?

On 1-year performance, CNEQ leads with 39.65% vs 28.98% for FBCG. On fees, CNEQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNEQ or FBCG?

Over the 1-year period, CNEQ has performed better with a 39.65% return vs 28.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNEQ or FBCG?

CNEQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNEQ or FBCG?

CNEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between CNEQ and FBCG?

They also come from different issuers: Alger and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CNEQ and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.