PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and HUKX.L (HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while HUKX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.L returned 21.60%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for HUKX.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNDX.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for HUKX.L.

Performance

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CNDX.L is traded in USD, while HUKX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HUKX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDX.L achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly higher than HUKX.L's 6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.L has outperformed HUKX.L with an annualized return of 21.60%, while HUKX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.

CNDX.L

1D
3.01%
1M
0.15%
YTD
16.86%
6M
18.12%
1Y
36.58%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
16.67%
10Y*
21.60%

HUKX.L

1D
1.31%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6.26%
6M
10.20%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		16.86%19.75%26.42%56.22%-33.49%27.92%48.25%37.96%-1.08%31.91%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP		6.26%35.72%7.75%13.02%-6.16%16.48%-8.93%22.13%-13.84%23.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CNDX.L and HUKX.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.54

The correlation between CNDX.L and HUKX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CNDX.L
HUKX.L

Technology

60.0%
0.3%

Communication Services

13.5%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
13.1%

Healthcare

3.6%
12.4%

Industrials

2.8%
13.0%

Utilities

1.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%
9.0%

Energy

0.5%
10.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
26.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.0%

Technology

CNDX.L
60.0%
HUKX.L
0.3%

Communication Services

CNDX.L
13.5%
HUKX.L
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CNDX.L
10.8%
HUKX.L
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

CNDX.L
6.4%
HUKX.L
13.1%

Healthcare

CNDX.L
3.6%
HUKX.L
12.4%

Industrials

CNDX.L
2.8%
HUKX.L
13.0%

Utilities

CNDX.L
1.1%
HUKX.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

CNDX.L
1.0%
HUKX.L
9.0%

Energy

CNDX.L
0.5%
HUKX.L
10.9%

Financial Services

CNDX.L
0.2%
HUKX.L
26.4%

Real Estate

CNDX.L
0.1%
HUKX.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP

Often compared with CNDX.L:
CNDX.L vs. QQQCNDX.L vs. EQQQ.DECNDX.L vs. SXRV.DECNDX.L vs. CNX1.LCNDX.L vs. CSPX.LCNDX.L vs. EQQU.LCNDX.L vs. VWRA.L
Often compared with HUKX.L:
HUKX.L vs. ISF.LHUKX.L vs. VUKG.LHUKX.L vs. VFWAXHUKX.L vs. EUDVHUKX.L vs. LDUK.LHUKX.L vs. HSPD.LHUKX.L vs. LDEG.L

Return for Risk

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CNDX.LHUKX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.17
1.41

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.03
2.01

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.95

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

6.55

+4.80

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDX.L and HUKX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum HUKX.L drawdown of -42.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.L and HUKX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CNDX.LHUKX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-42.05%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-9.74%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-13.28%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

-26.01%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-42.05%

+6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-3.55%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-7.74%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.90%

+0.25%

Volatility

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) at 4.43%. This indicates that CNDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CNDX.LHUKX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

4.43%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

11.39%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

13.46%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

16.42%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

18.17%

+1.95%

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDX.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than HUKX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNDX.L vs. HUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

CNDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP		2.83%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

CNDX.L and HUKX.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.

CNDX.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HUKX.L is Europe Equities. CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CNDX.L and 0.07% for HUKX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNDX.L and HUKX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer