CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE
CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - CNDX.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while 6AQQ.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.L returned 21.62%/yr vs 21.69%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNDX.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.
Performance
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CNDX.L is traded in USD, while 6AQQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 6AQQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNDX.L having a 19.65% return and 6AQQ.DE slightly lower at 19.25%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CNDX.L having a 21.62% annualized return and 6AQQ.DE not far ahead at 21.69%.
CNDX.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 19.65%
- 6M
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 39.29%
- 3Y*
- 27.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- 21.62%
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 39.28%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.76%
- 10Y*
- 21.69%
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 19.65% | 19.75% | 26.45% | 56.31% | -33.45% | 27.96% | 48.33% | 38.07% | -1.03% | 32.36% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 19.25% | 20.88% | 26.12% | 56.33% | -33.82% | 28.61% | 47.89% | 39.88% | -1.63% | 32.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.L and 6AQQ.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CNDX.L and 6AQQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNDX.L
6AQQ.DE
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNDX.L | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.70 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.03 | 13.64 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNDX.L | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.55 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.85 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 1.04 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, roughly equal to the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.L and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDX.L | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -35.00% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -10.84% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.44% | -23.05% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.17% | -35.00% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.17% | -35.00% | -0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.83% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -5.16% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.94% | +0.13% |
Volatility
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.65%. This indicates that CNDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDX.L | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 4.65% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 11.46% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.79% | 15.72% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 20.64% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 19.93% | +0.14% |
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNDX.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNDX.L nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CNDX.L and 6AQQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.
CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CNDX.L and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNDX.L and 6AQQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer