PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CNDX.AS is traded in EUR, while WINC.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WINC.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDX.AS achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly higher than WINC.AS's 9.49% return.


CNDX.AS

1D
-0.77%
1M
9.31%
YTD
20.95%
6M
19.45%
1Y
37.78%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.25%

WINC.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
3.28%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.18%
1Y
21.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
20.95%6.16%22.17%
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc
10.12%7.70%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CNDX.AS and WINC.AS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.63

The correlation between CNDX.AS and WINC.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDX.AS
CNDX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

WINC.AS
WINC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNDX.ASWINC.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

5.09

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

17.89

-6.88

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDX.AS and WINC.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNDX.ASWINC.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.99

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

1.18

-0.15

Drawdowns

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than WINC.AS's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and WINC.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNDX.ASWINC.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-18.74%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-4.26%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.69%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-3.04%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

1.21%

+2.20%

Volatility

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) at 2.92%. This indicates that CNDX.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNDX.ASWINC.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

2.92%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

8.04%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

10.89%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

14.37%

+5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

14.37%

+5.24%

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than WINC.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNDX.AS vs. WINC.AS - Dividend Comparison

CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WINC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%.


PositionTTM20252024
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc
9.64%9.38%4.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNDX.AS and WINC.AS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WINC.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WINC.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.

CNDX.AS is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while WINC.AS is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNDX.AS and 0.35% for WINC.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNDX.AS and WINC.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer