CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE
CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - CNDX.AS tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while LYMS.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNDX.AS returned 21.25%/yr vs 21.41%/yr for LYMS.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CNDX.AS charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNDX.AS having a 20.95% return and LYMS.DE slightly lower at 20.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CNDX.AS having a 21.25% annualized return and LYMS.DE not far ahead at 21.41%.
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 37.78%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 20.95% | 6.16% | 35.29% | 50.41% | -29.90% | 38.80% | 35.83% | 40.51% | 4.53% | 16.12% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | 3.18% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.AS and LYMS.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011 | 0.98 |
The correlation between CNDX.AS and LYMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNDX.AS
LYMS.DE
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNDX.AS | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.77 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 11.23 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNDX.AS | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.40 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.94 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.77 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDX.AS | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -50.00% | +18.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -10.02% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -26.74% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | -31.12% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | -31.12% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.86% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -8.78% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 3.37% | +0.04% |
Volatility
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDX.AS | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.37% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 10.99% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 15.73% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 19.91% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 19.68% | -0.07% |
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNDX.AS vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNDX.AS nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, CNDX.AS and LYMS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
CNDX.AS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNDX.AS and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNDX.AS and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer