PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNCR vs. PSCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNCR vs. PSCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSCH

1D
-1.23%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
0.51%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
0.02%
5Y*
-5.87%
10Y*
6.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCR vs. PSCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


CNCR vs. PSCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNCR
PSCH

Healthcare

96.6%
97.3%

Financial Services

3.3%
1.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

CNCR
96.6%
PSCH
97.3%

Financial Services

CNCR
3.3%
PSCH
1.1%

Basic Materials

CNCR

-

PSCH

-

Communication Services

CNCR

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Cyclical

CNCR

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Defensive

CNCR

-

PSCH

-

Energy

CNCR

-

PSCH

-

Industrials

CNCR

-

PSCH
0.7%

Real Estate

CNCR

-

PSCH

-

Technology

CNCR

-

PSCH
1.7%

Utilities

CNCR

-

PSCH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNCR vs. PSCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCR

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCR vs. PSCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNCR vs. PSCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNCRPSCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

Drawdowns

CNCR vs. PSCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PSCH drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and PSCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNCRPSCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-46.32%

+46.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-31.47%

+31.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.45%

+13.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

Volatility

CNCR vs. PSCH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNCRPSCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

20.24%

-20.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

22.89%

-22.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

23.63%

-23.63%

CNCR vs. PSCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCH's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNCR vs. PSCH - Dividend Comparison

CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

PSCH has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index, while PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.29% for PSCH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNCR and PSCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer