CNCR vs. MHIP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) and MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. CNCR is passively managed, while MHIP is actively managed. CNCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MHIP.

Performance

CNCR vs. MHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MHIP

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 0.71%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCR vs. MHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF	0.14%

Return for Risk

CNCR vs. MHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CNCR vs. MHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MHIP drawdown of -3.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and MHIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCR	MHIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-3.09%	+3.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.47%	+1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-1.28%	+1.28%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCR	MHIP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	11.54%	-11.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	11.54%	-11.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	11.54%	-11.54%

CNCR vs. MHIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MHIP's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCR vs. MHIP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNCR nor MHIP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CNCR or MHIP?

On fees, MHIP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCR or MHIP?

MHIP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNCR or MHIP?

CNCR and MHIP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CNCR and MHIP?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Milliman. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.55% for MHIP.