CNCR vs. IHE
CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) and IHE (iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index while IHE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index. Both are passively managed. CNCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IHE.
Performance
CNCR vs. IHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHE
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 40.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
CNCR vs. IHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
IHE iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | -0.05% |
CNCR vs. IHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNCR
IHE
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
CNCR
IHE
Financial Services
CNCR
IHE
-
Basic Materials
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Communication Services
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Consumer Defensive
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Energy
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Industrials
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Real Estate
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Technology
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Utilities
CNCR
-
IHE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNCR vs. IHE — Risk / Return Rank
CNCR
IHE
CNCR vs. IHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNCR | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.51 | — |
Drawdowns
CNCR vs. IHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IHE drawdown of -38.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and IHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCR | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -38.20% | +38.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.80% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -7.92% | +7.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility
CNCR vs. IHE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNCR | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 17.07% | -17.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 16.24% | -16.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.05% | -18.05% |
CNCR vs. IHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IHE's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNCR vs. IHE - Dividend Comparison
CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHE iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.65% | 1.76% | 1.73% | 1.39% | 2.01% | 1.49% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 1.25% | 1.36% | 0.92% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IHE is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IHE is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.
IHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index, while IHE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.42% for IHE.
Find the right allocation for CNCR and IHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer