PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNCR vs. HEAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNCR vs. HEAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNCR vs. HEAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEAL

1D
0.38%
1M
-10.18%
YTD
-18.14%
6M
-25.10%
1Y
-14.22%
3Y*
-11.96%
5Y*
-16.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNCR vs. HEAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HEAL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CNCR vs. HEAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCR

HEAL
HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCR vs. HEAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNCR vs. HEAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNCRHEALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

Dividends

CNCR vs. HEAL - Dividend Comparison

CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
0.40%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%

Drawdowns

CNCR vs. HEAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum HEAL drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and HEAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNCRHEALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-65.76%

+65.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-64.66%

+64.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-42.42%

+42.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.04%

Volatility

CNCR vs. HEAL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNCRHEALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

24.64%

-24.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

26.33%

-26.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

26.32%

-26.32%