PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEAL vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HEAL vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HEAL vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
-18.45%-0.62%-2.87%-12.61%-29.99%-14.21%23.87%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
8.61%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%-2.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -18.45% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 8.61% return.


HEAL

1D
2.83%
1M
-10.48%
YTD
-18.45%
6M
-25.27%
1Y
-15.69%
3Y*
-12.07%
5Y*
-16.45%
10Y*

IAU

1D
3.80%
1M
-11.01%
YTD
8.61%
6M
21.15%
1Y
49.53%
3Y*
33.12%
5Y*
21.78%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HEAL vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HEAL vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEAL
HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEAL vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEALIAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.64

1.80

-2.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.81

2.24

-3.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.33

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

2.69

-3.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.38

9.97

-11.35

HEAL vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEAL and IAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEALIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

1.80

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

1.24

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.64

-1.07

Correlation

The correlation between HEAL and IAU is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HEAL vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
0.40%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HEAL vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and IAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HEALIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.76%

-45.14%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.71%

-19.18%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.76%

-20.93%

-40.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.79%

-13.20%

-51.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-15.98%

-26.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.89%

5.18%

+5.71%

Volatility

HEAL vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) is 7.53%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that HEAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HEALIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

11.02%

-3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

24.11%

-7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.65%

27.62%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.35%

17.69%

+8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

15.82%

+10.51%