PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNCR vs. FTXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNCR vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXH

1D
-1.29%
1M
0.42%
YTD
3.25%
6M
5.49%
1Y
34.34%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCR vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


CNCR vs. FTXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNCR
FTXH

Healthcare

96.6%
100.0%

Financial Services

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

CNCR
96.6%
FTXH
100.0%

Financial Services

CNCR
3.3%
FTXH

-

Basic Materials

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Communication Services

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Consumer Cyclical

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Consumer Defensive

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Energy

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Industrials

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Real Estate

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Technology

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Utilities

CNCR

-

FTXH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNCR vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCR

FTXH
FTXH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FTXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCR vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNCR vs. FTXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNCRFTXHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

Drawdowns

CNCR vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FTXH drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and FTXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNCRFTXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-32.11%

+32.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.49%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.84%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

Volatility

CNCR vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNCRFTXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

16.91%

-16.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

16.29%

-16.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.41%

-18.41%

CNCR vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNCR vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison

CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXH
First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.24%1.41%1.66%1.55%1.11%1.03%0.82%0.67%0.91%2.18%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index, while FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.60% for FTXH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNCR and FTXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer