CNCR vs. FTXH
CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) and FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index while FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. Both are passively managed. CNCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXH.
Performance
CNCR vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXH
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 34.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CNCR vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | -3.92% |
CNCR vs. FTXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNCR
FTXH
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
CNCR
FTXH
Financial Services
CNCR
FTXH
-
Basic Materials
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Communication Services
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Consumer Cyclical
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Consumer Defensive
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Energy
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Industrials
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Real Estate
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Technology
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Utilities
CNCR
-
FTXH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNCR vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank
CNCR
FTXH
CNCR vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNCR | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.37 | — |
Drawdowns
CNCR vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FTXH drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and FTXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCR | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -32.11% | +32.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.49% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.84% | +5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility
CNCR vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNCR | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 16.91% | -16.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 16.29% | -16.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.41% | -18.41% |
CNCR vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNCR vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison
CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index, while FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.60% for FTXH.
Find the right allocation for CNCR and FTXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer