CNCG vs. INTW

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

CNCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNCG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

CNCG vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNCG

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 25.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -10.86%
• 1M: 3.79%
• 6M: 506.58%
• YTD: 587.83%
• 1Y: 1,398.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCG vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF	28.23%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	-12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CNCG and INTW is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.02

Return for Risk

CNCG vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCG vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNCG	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	9.87	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.68	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.59	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	30.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	68.31	—

Drawdowns

CNCG vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCG drawdown since its inception was -16.89%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCG and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCG	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.89%	-60.58%	+43.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-29.21%	+27.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-29.38%	+23.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCG	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	60.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	122.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.83%	152.05%	-64.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.83%	149.16%	-61.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.83%	149.16%	-61.33%

CNCG vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCG vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNCG nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNCG and INTW in my portfolio?

CNCG and INTW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNCG or INTW?

On fees, CNCG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCG or INTW?

CNCG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNCG or INTW?

CNCG and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CNCG and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNCG and 1.50% for INTW.