CNCG vs. MULL

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

CNCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. CNCG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

CNCG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNCG

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 25.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: -11.74%
• 1M: -30.67%
• 6M: 495.12%
• YTD: 618.86%
• 1Y: 2,976.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF	28.23%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	-7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CNCG and MULL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.06

Return for Risk

CNCG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNCG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	20.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.22	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.66	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	57.42	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	187.84	—

Drawdowns

CNCG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCG drawdown since its inception was -16.89%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCG and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCG	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.89%	-72.29%	+55.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-39.92%	+38.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-20.53%	+15.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCG	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	77.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	126.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.83%	151.52%	-63.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.83%	145.26%	-57.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.83%	145.26%	-57.43%

CNCG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

CNCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025
CNCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.05%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNCG and MULL in my portfolio?

CNCG and MULL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNCG or MULL?

On fees, CNCG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCG or MULL?

CNCG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNCG or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for CNCG.

What is the main difference between CNCG and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNCG and 1.50% for MULL.