CNCG vs. DLLL

Last updated Jul 24, 2026

CNCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CNCG is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNCG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.

Performance

CNCG vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNCG

• 1D: -6.72%
• 1M: -1.20%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DLLL

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: 894.67%
• YTD: 762.38%
• 1Y: 654.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 336.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CNCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF	$29.37K	$44.86K	$43.76K
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	$33.30M	$39.53M	$50.05M

CNCG vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF	11.85%
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	76.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CNCG and DLLL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.11

Return for Risk

CNCG vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCG vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNCG	DLLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	11.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	22.81	—

Drawdowns

CNCG vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCG drawdown since its inception was -16.89%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCG and DLLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCG	DLLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.89%	-68.58%	+51.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-57.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.73%	-18.42%	+3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-25.72%	+19.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCG	DLLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	47.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	110.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.63%	137.73%	-54.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.63%	131.65%	-48.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.63%	131.65%	-48.02%

CNCG vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCG vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNCG nor DLLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNCG and DLLL in my portfolio?

CNCG and DLLL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNCG or DLLL?

On fees, CNCG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCG or DLLL?

CNCG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNCG or DLLL?

CNCG and DLLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CNCG and DLLL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNCG and 1.50% for DLLL.