CNCG vs. AMDG

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

CNCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CNCG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNCG

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 25.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDG

• 1D: -8.75%
• 1M: -15.68%
• 6M: 282.51%
• YTD: 314.05%
• 1Y: 697.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF	28.23%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CNCG and AMDG is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.10

Return for Risk

CNCG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF (CNCG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNCG	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	12.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	23.90	—

Drawdowns

CNCG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCG drawdown since its inception was -16.89%, smaller than the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCG and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCG	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.89%	-63.32%	+46.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-21.65%	+19.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-25.12%	+19.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCG	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	51.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	105.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.83%	135.78%	-47.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.83%	132.81%	-44.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.83%	132.81%	-44.98%

CNCG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CNCG and AMDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CNCG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

CNCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	2.71%	11.21%
CNCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNCG and AMDG in my portfolio?

CNCG and AMDG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNCG or AMDG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCG or AMDG?

CNCG and AMDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNCG or AMDG?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for CNCG.