PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNBS vs. VPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNBS vs. VPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNBS vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
-19.71%15.33%-29.41%-16.11%-63.98%-19.02%31.94%-44.97%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
-12.24%-6.75%10.52%22.20%-11.70%34.18%-9.50%3.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a -19.71% return, which is significantly lower than VPC's -12.24% return.


CNBS

1D
3.35%
1M
1.68%
YTD
-19.71%
6M
-25.83%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
-12.81%
5Y*
-37.62%
10Y*

VPC

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-12.24%
6M
-12.72%
1Y
-17.70%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNBS vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VPC's 5.53% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CNBS vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNBS
CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VPC
VPC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNBS vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNBSVPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

-1.07

+1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

-1.41

+2.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.82

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

-0.75

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.34

-1.77

+3.10

CNBS vs. VPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the VPC Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNBS and VPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNBSVPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

-1.07

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.60

0.15

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.18

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between CNBS and VPC is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CNBS vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison

CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.89%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%43.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
17.89%14.33%11.26%11.71%10.74%6.31%10.06%8.19%

Drawdowns

CNBS vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than VPC's maximum drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and VPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNBSVPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.71%

-53.45%

-42.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.25%

-22.76%

-28.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.21%

-24.86%

-69.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.00%

-22.27%

-70.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.74%

-7.42%

-63.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.95%

9.67%

+16.28%

Volatility

CNBS vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a higher volatility of 22.14% compared to Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) at 5.54%. This indicates that CNBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNBSVPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.14%

5.54%

+16.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.61%

10.47%

+65.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.71%

16.61%

+85.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.86%

13.39%

+49.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.38%

20.68%

+39.70%