CNBS vs. BITY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY).

CNBS and BITY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNBS is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019. BITY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025.

Performance

CNBS vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNBS vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	-19.71%	54.88%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-18.03%	-8.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a -19.71% return, which is significantly lower than BITY's -18.03% return.

CNBS

• 1D: 3.35%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: -19.71%
• 6M: -25.83%
• 1Y: 34.54%
• 3Y*: -12.81%
• 5Y*: -37.62%
• 10Y*: —

BITY

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: -18.03%
• 6M: -39.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNBS vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.

CNBS

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF

BITY

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF

Return for Risk

CNBS vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNBS

CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 31
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNBS vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNBS	BITY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNBS	BITY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.46	-0.67	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between CNBS and BITY is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CNBS vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.19%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	43.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.58%	0.58%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	35.19%	21.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CNBS vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than BITY's maximum drawdown of -46.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and BITY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNBS	BITY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.71%	-46.36%	-49.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.00%	-41.90%	-51.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.74%	-16.65%	-54.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNBS	BITY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	75.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	101.71%	39.94%	+61.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.86%	39.94%	+22.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.38%	39.94%	+20.44%