CNAV vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CNAV returned 68.66% vs 38.07% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNAV charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

CNAV vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNAV achieves a 45.28% return, which is significantly higher than BLCR's 16.56% return.

CNAV

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 45.28%
• 6M: 42.61%
• 1Y: 68.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 6M: 15.12%
• 1Y: 38.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNAV vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	45.28%	16.80%	6.05%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	16.56%	30.93%	1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CNAV and BLCR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.84

The correlation between CNAV and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CNAV vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 84
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 81
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNAV vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNAV	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.34	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.13	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.32	3.73	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.82	16.81	+4.02

CNAV vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNAV Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNAV and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNAV vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNAV drawdown since its inception was -30.06%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAV and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNAV	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.06%	-21.29%	-8.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.97%	-10.26%	-2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.83%	-2.88%	-3.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-2.20%	-3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	2.27%	+1.04%

Volatility

CNAV vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a higher volatility of 16.54% compared to Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) at 6.32%. This indicates that CNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNAV	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.54%	6.32%	+10.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.55%	13.10%	+12.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.97%	16.42%	+12.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.99%	17.66%	+11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.99%	17.66%	+11.33%

CNAV vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNAV has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNAV vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNAV and BLCR in my portfolio?

CNAV and BLCR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNAV or BLCR?

CNAV has higher volatility (16.54%) compared to BLCR (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNAV dropped -30.06% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, CNAV or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 68.66% vs 38.07% for BLCR. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BLCR has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNAV or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 68.66% return vs 38.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNAV or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNAV or BLCR?

BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between CNAV and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for CNAV and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.