PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CMXC.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMXC.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than ALAU.L's 13.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMXC.L having a 6.68% annualized return and ALAU.L not far ahead at 6.94%.


CMXC.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
-5.29%
6M
4.35%
YTD
9.93%
1Y
33.06%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
6.68%

ALAU.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.12%
6M
7.68%
YTD
13.30%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMXC.L
iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.93%57.29%-28.08%37.82%-1.14%19.07%-0.08%9.79%-13.57%12.59%
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America
13.30%55.22%-26.49%32.27%8.88%-9.44%-13.65%17.11%-7.39%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CMXC.L and ALAU.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2011

0.66

The correlation between CMXC.L and ALAU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMXC.L
CMXC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CMXC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMXC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMXC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CMXC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMXC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAU.L
ALAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CMXC.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMXC.LALAU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.68

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.77

7.17

+0.60

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMXC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMXC.L and ALAU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMXC.L drawdown since its inception was -60.38%, roughly equal to the maximum ALAU.L drawdown of -62.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMXC.L and ALAU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMXC.LALAU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.38%

-62.98%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.65%

-14.94%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.66%

-27.24%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.66%

-28.77%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.90%

-54.88%

+1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-9.29%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-28.40%

+9.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

5.58%

-1.46%

Volatility

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Mexico Capped UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CMXC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) at 5.78%. This indicates that CMXC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMXC.LALAU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

5.78%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.01%

17.41%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.22%

20.94%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.36%

22.91%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

26.23%

-0.59%

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMXC.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAU.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMXC.L vs. ALAU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMXC.L nor ALAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CMXC.L and ALAU.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMXC.L.

CMXC.L tracks MSCI Mexico Capped Index (Net Return Index), while ALAU.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CMXC.L and 0.10% for ALAU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMXC.L and ALAU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer