PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMUVX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMUVX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than FSIRX's 6.24% return.


CMUVX

1D
-1.42%
1M
0.21%
YTD
7.63%
6M
6.76%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
10Y*

FSIRX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
6.24%
6M
5.88%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
5.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
7.63%14.69%13.39%19.07%-17.54%3.47%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
6.24%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CMUVX and FSIRX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between CMUVX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMUVX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMUVX
CMUVX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CMUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CMUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMUVXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

4.11

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

17.73

-7.33

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMUVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMUVX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMUVX drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMUVX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMUVXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-33.39%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-3.01%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-5.81%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-3.01%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-4.16%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

0.70%

+1.06%

Volatility

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.38%. This indicates that CMUVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMUVXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

1.38%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

3.88%

+4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

4.92%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

6.92%

+6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

6.75%

+6.45%

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMUVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMUVX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

CMUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.58%, more than FSIRX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
33.58%36.14%2.54%2.03%2.47%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.28%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMUVX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMUVX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FSIRX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMUVX dropped -23.51% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMUVX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer