PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMUVX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CMUVX having a 8.85% return and FRGAX slightly lower at 8.73%.


CMUVX

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.71%
YTD
8.85%
6M
9.19%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10Y*

FRGAX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.80%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.06%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
8.85%14.69%13.39%19.07%-2.33%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
8.73%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CMUVX and FRGAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.97

The correlation between CMUVX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMUVX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMUVX
CMUVX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CMUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CMUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMUVXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.13

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

14.01

-2.16

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMUVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMUVX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMUVXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.43

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.52

-0.87

Drawdowns

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMUVX drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMUVX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMUVXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-11.77%

-11.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-7.03%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-11.77%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.59%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-1.58%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.57%

+0.15%

Volatility

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMUVXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.80%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.22%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.76%

9.05%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

10.31%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.15%

10.31%

+2.84%

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMUVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMUVX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

CMUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.21%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
33.21%36.14%2.54%2.03%2.47%0.06%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CMUVX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMUVX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to FRGAX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMUVX dropped -23.51% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMUVX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer