PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMUVX vs. DMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMUVX vs. DMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMUVX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -11.61% return.


CMUVX

1D
-1.42%
1M
0.21%
YTD
7.63%
6M
6.76%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
10Y*

DMA

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.21%
YTD
-11.61%
6M
-12.39%
1Y
-2.46%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMUVX vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
7.63%14.69%13.39%19.07%-16.90%
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
-11.61%16.89%41.06%-3.81%-37.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CMUVX and DMA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMUVX vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMUVX
CMUVX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CMUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CMUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DMA
DMA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMUVX vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMUVXDMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.98

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

-0.13

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

-0.37

+10.77

CMUVX vs. DMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMUVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the DMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMUVX and DMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMUVX vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMUVX drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum DMA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMUVX and DMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMUVXDMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-53.24%

+29.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-18.34%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-18.34%

+4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-13.19%

+11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-25.66%

+19.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

6.62%

-4.86%

Volatility

CMUVX vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund (CMUVX) is 4.20%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that CMUVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMUVXDMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

8.23%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

13.46%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

15.21%

-4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

27.23%

-14.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

27.23%

-14.03%

CMUVX vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMUVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DMA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMUVX vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison

CMUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.58%, more than DMA's 16.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CMUVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 75/25 Fund
33.58%36.14%2.54%2.03%2.47%0.06%
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
16.74%9.42%3.83%5.22%10.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMUVX and DMA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMA has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to CMUVX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMUVX dropped -23.51% vs DMA's -53.24%.

CMUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMUVX and DMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer