CMU.L vs. LCPE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L returned 10.79%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.

Performance

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L has outperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 10.79%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

LCPE.L

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 14.20%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: 27.63%
• 3Y*: 11.83%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.89%	25.71%	1.42%	14.39%	-5.30%	13.03%	4.59%	19.05%	-11.56%	17.21%
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS	14.20%	18.88%	-2.83%	10.70%	0.29%	16.28%	8.38%	12.94%	-2.26%	9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CMU.L and LCPE.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015	0.40

Over the past year, CMU.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CMU.L	LCPE.L
Technology	30.8%	0.2%
Financial Services	21.8%	-
Industrials	15.7%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	1.9%
Utilities	5.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	32.8%
Healthcare	4.2%	32.6%
Basic Materials	2.8%	32.3%
Communication Services	2.3%	0.0%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.0%
Energy	0.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

LCPE.L

LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMU.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.44	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	3.49	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	4.13	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.67	13.66	-3.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMU.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.44	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	1.04	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	1.20	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.98	-0.50

Drawdowns

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and LCPE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMU.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.53%	-27.05%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-6.66%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.95%	-12.39%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.11%	-12.39%	-8.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.41%	-27.05%	-4.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-2.71%	+2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-3.52%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	2.02%	+1.03%

Volatility

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that CMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMU.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	3.81%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.44%	8.48%	+3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.86%	11.29%	+3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	17.74%	-1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.78%	20.60%	-3.82%

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMU.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMU.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMU.L and LCPE.L in my portfolio?

CMU.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMU.L or LCPE.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMU.L or LCPE.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

What is the main difference between CMU.L and LCPE.L?

CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.