PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMU.L vs. EEI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than EEI.L's 10.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L has outperformed EEI.L with an annualized return of 10.79%, while EEI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.18% annualized return.


CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%

EEI.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
10.61%
6M
13.73%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
10.61%26.84%-7.65%5.93%0.84%5.79%-16.98%9.05%-10.50%9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CMU.L and EEI.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2014

0.85

The correlation between CMU.L and EEI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CMU.L
EEI.L

Technology

30.8%
1.5%

Financial Services

21.8%
24.7%

Industrials

15.7%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
3.3%

Utilities

5.8%
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
2.3%

Healthcare

4.2%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
8.3%

Communication Services

2.3%
8.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
4.8%

Energy

0.0%
11.6%

Technology

CMU.L
30.8%
EEI.L
1.5%

Financial Services

CMU.L
21.8%
EEI.L
24.7%

Industrials

CMU.L
15.7%
EEI.L
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CMU.L
10.1%
EEI.L
3.3%

Utilities

CMU.L
5.8%
EEI.L
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

CMU.L
5.2%
EEI.L
2.3%

Healthcare

CMU.L
4.2%
EEI.L
2.8%

Basic Materials

CMU.L
2.8%
EEI.L
8.3%

Communication Services

CMU.L
2.3%
EEI.L
8.6%

Real Estate

CMU.L
1.3%
EEI.L
4.8%

Energy

CMU.L
0.0%
EEI.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMU.L vs. EEI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EEI.L
EEI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EEI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EEI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMU.LEEI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.71

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

10.53

-0.86

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the EEI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU.L and EEI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMU.LEEI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.07

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.46

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.27

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.21

+0.27

Drawdowns

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum EEI.L drawdown of -37.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and EEI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMU.LEEI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-37.68%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-8.29%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

-14.75%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-17.71%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.41%

-37.68%

+6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.98%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-11.38%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.14%

+0.91%

Volatility

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that CMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMU.LEEI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

3.45%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

8.55%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

10.89%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

13.75%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

15.52%

+1.26%

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EEI.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMU.L vs. EEI.L - Dividend Comparison

CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
0.05%0.05%0.07%0.06%0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.05%0.04%0.03%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMU.L and EEI.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EEI.L.

CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while EEI.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.29% for EEI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMU.L and EEI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer