CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE
CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) and AMEM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - CMU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while AMEM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L returned 10.12%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for AMEM.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEM.DE.
Performance
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMU.L is traded in GBp, while AMEM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AMEM.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly lower than AMEM.DE's 17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L has outperformed AMEM.DE with an annualized return of 10.12%, while AMEM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- YTD
- 15.46%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.12%
AMEM.DE
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -10.11%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 17.55%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.46% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -11.56% | 17.21% |
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR | 17.55% | 25.43% | 8.73% | 3.25% | -9.11% | -3.38% | 12.44% | 14.93% | -9.75% | 25.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMU.L and AMEM.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2011 | 0.61 |
The correlation between CMU.L and AMEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CMU.L
AMEM.DE
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMU.L | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.64 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 8.39 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -31.46%, roughly equal to the maximum AMEM.DE drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and AMEM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMU.L | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.46% | -31.41% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -12.30% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.95% | -16.71% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | -21.79% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.41% | -27.39% | -4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -11.28% | +7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -10.96% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.88% | -0.79% |
Volatility
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) is 3.79%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that CMU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMU.L | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 8.37% | -4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 17.60% | -4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 19.75% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.03% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 18.47% | -1.79% |
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CMU.L vs. AMEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMU.L nor AMEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMU.L and AMEM.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEM.DE.
CMU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while AMEM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while AMEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.20% for AMEM.DE.
Find the right allocation for CMU.L and AMEM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer