CMTFX vs. GSFTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX).
CMTFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000. GSFTX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Mar 4, 1998.
Performance
CMTFX vs. GSFTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMTFX vs. GSFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | -10.17% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -34.63% | 23.04% | 49.65% | 44.21% | -1.26% | 43.38% |
GSFTX Columbia Dividend Income Fund | 1.58% | 15.88% | 15.00% | 10.57% | -4.94% | 26.26% | 7.75% | 28.12% | -4.38% | 20.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMTFX achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than GSFTX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CMTFX has outperformed GSFTX with an annualized return of 20.54%, while GSFTX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.96% annualized return.
CMTFX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
GSFTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 14.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMTFX vs. GSFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMTFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than GSFTX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMTFX vs. GSFTX — Risk / Return Rank
CMTFX
GSFTX
CMTFX vs. GSFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMTFX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.19 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.69 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.46 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 6.80 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMTFX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.19 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.80 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.77 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMTFX and GSFTX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMTFX vs. GSFTX - Dividend Comparison
CMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than GSFTX's 5.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 3.44% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
GSFTX Columbia Dividend Income Fund | 5.31% | 5.35% | 6.02% | 4.96% | 3.87% | 2.87% | 1.74% | 2.90% | 7.63% | 4.00% | 3.77% | 8.27% |
Drawdowns
CMTFX vs. GSFTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMTFX drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than GSFTX's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMTFX and GSFTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMTFX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -47.69% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -10.18% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.42% | -17.01% | -22.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.42% | -32.76% | -6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.35% | -5.48% | -8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -6.40% | -10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.18% | +1.86% |
Volatility
CMTFX vs. GSFTX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) at 2.90%. This indicates that CMTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSFTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMTFX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 2.90% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 6.81% | +9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.01% | 13.61% | +13.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 13.28% | +12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 15.68% | +8.98% |