PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMPVX vs. DGIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPVX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 17.45% return.


CMPVX

1D
0.25%
1M
3.44%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.06%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
10Y*

DGIFX

1D
0.76%
1M
6.56%
YTD
17.45%
6M
16.09%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMPVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund
7.80%12.97%10.59%16.55%-16.34%2.57%
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
17.45%3.54%21.13%33.10%-18.35%2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CMPVX and DGIFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.86

The correlation between CMPVX and DGIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMPVX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPVX
CMPVX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CMPVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMPVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMPVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CMPVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMPVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DGIFX
DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMPVXDGIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.55

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.96

7.92

+4.04

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPVX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMPVXDGIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.80

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.71

-0.08

Drawdowns

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPVX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, smaller than the maximum DGIFX drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPVX and DGIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMPVXDGIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-30.93%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

-10.91%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.96%

-30.93%

+19.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-5.90%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

3.50%

-2.01%

Volatility

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund (CMPVX) is 2.52%, while Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that CMPVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMPVXDGIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

4.23%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

11.14%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12%

15.47%

-7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

21.11%

-10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.93%

18.66%

-7.73%

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMPVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMPVX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

CMPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than DGIFX's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMPVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Alpha Plus Fund
4.24%4.57%3.32%2.04%1.58%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
7.02%8.29%20.95%2.78%2.21%11.12%10.09%3.53%3.74%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMPVX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to CMPVX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPVX dropped -21.62% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

CMPVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMPVX and DGIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer