PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMPGX vs. PDSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) and Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMPGX achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than PDSYX's 4.92% return.


CMPGX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.08%
6M
0.28%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
0.58%

PDSYX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
4.92%
6M
4.77%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMPGX
Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund
0.08%7.56%0.46%3.98%-12.34%-1.80%2.50%1.90%
PDSYX
Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund
4.92%7.90%3.65%2.45%-5.36%14.81%2.43%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CMPGX and PDSYX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019

0.23

The correlation between CMPGX and PDSYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMPGX vs. PDSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMPGX
CMPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CMPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CMPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PDSYX
PDSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PDSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PDSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) and Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMPGXPDSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.65

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

4.75

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

20.80

-14.92

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the PDSYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMPGX and PDSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMPGXPDSYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

3.15

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.57

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.57

+0.26

Drawdowns

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMPGX drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum PDSYX drawdown of -30.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMPGX and PDSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMPGXPDSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-30.01%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-1.98%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.19%

-5.84%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-10.95%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-0.48%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-4.35%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.45%

+0.55%

Volatility

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund (CMPGX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX) at 0.94%. This indicates that CMPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMPGXPDSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

0.94%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

2.32%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

2.99%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

6.32%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

8.72%

-3.75%

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMPGX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than PDSYX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMPGX vs. PDSYX - Dividend Comparison

CMPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than PDSYX's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMPGX
Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund
3.61%3.44%2.84%2.19%1.35%1.08%2.00%2.43%2.65%3.30%3.76%2.96%
PDSYX
Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund
1.76%1.85%2.18%2.06%1.58%7.46%2.70%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMPGX and PDSYX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMPGX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to PDSYX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMPGX dropped -19.56% vs PDSYX's -30.01%.

PDSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMPGX and PDSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer