CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO
CMNY.TO (CI Money Market ETF CAD Series) and LONG.TO (CI Global Longevity Economy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CMNY.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by CI, while LONG.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CMNY.TO returned 2.50% vs 21.09% for LONG.TO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMNY.TO achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than LONG.TO's 7.98% return.
CMNY.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LONG.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 21.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- —
CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series | 1.31% | 2.83% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 7.98% | 6.19% | 25.86% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMNY.TO and LONG.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CMNY.TO
LONG.TO
CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) and CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMNY.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +15.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.59 | 1.22 | +2.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 50.18 | 1.28 | +48.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 199.02 | 4.55 | +194.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMNY.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.83%, smaller than the maximum LONG.TO drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNY.TO and LONG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMNY.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -23.65% | +22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.05% | -16.39% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.87% | +2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -5.64% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 4.61% | -4.60% |
Volatility
CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) is 0.10%, while CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that CMNY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LONG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMNY.TO | LONG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 7.03% | -6.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.22% | 14.80% | -14.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34% | 17.62% | -17.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 17.56% | -16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 17.80% | -16.80% |
Dividends
CMNY.TO vs. LONG.TO - Dividend Comparison
CMNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while LONG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series | 2.48% | 2.89% | 4.64% | 2.02% |
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMNY.TO and LONG.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMNY.TO is categorized as Money Market, while LONG.TO is Health & Biotech Equities.
Find the right allocation for CMNY.TO and LONG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer