LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

LONG.TO (CI Global Longevity Economy Fund) and VXM-B.TO (CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - LONG.TO is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by CI, while VXM-B.TO is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Value Index. LONG.TO is actively managed, while VXM-B.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LONG.TO returned 10.40%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for VXM-B.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) and CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LONG.TO achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than VXM-B.TO's 8.67% return.

LONG.TO

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 7.64%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: 21.51%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

VXM-B.TO

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 8.67%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: 27.12%
• 5Y*: 17.52%
• 10Y*: 12.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund	7.64%	6.19%	25.86%	19.50%	-9.01%	11.77%	22.32%
VXM-B.TO CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)	8.67%	46.74%	18.34%	18.89%	-2.50%	9.58%	6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LONG.TO and VXM-B.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2020	0.15

The correlation between LONG.TO and VXM-B.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONG.TO

LONG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
LONG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LONG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LONG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LONG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
LONG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

VXM-B.TO

VXM-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
VXM-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
VXM-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
VXM-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VXM-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VXM-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) and CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LONG.TO	VXM-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.14	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.91	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.38	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	2.76	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.21	9.99	-4.78

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the VXM-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONG.TO and VXM-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONG.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.65%, smaller than the maximum VXM-B.TO drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONG.TO and VXM-B.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LONG.TO	VXM-B.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.65%	-38.71%	+15.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.39%	-10.33%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.45%	-13.31%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.65%	-22.12%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-4.06%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	-7.79%	+2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	2.85%	+1.73%

Volatility

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Longevity Economy Fund (LONG.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) at 3.76%. This indicates that LONG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXM-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LONG.TO	VXM-B.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	3.76%	+2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	10.89%	+3.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	13.37%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.38%	13.75%	+3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.72%	15.15%	+2.57%

Dividends

LONG.TO vs. VXM-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

LONG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXM-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LONG.TO CI Global Longevity Economy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VXM-B.TO CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)	2.01%	2.21%	3.97%	3.67%	3.67%	2.05%	2.18%	1.59%	2.05%	1.52%	1.42%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LONG.TO and VXM-B.TO in my portfolio?

LONG.TO and VXM-B.TO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between LONG.TO and VXM-B.TO?

LONG.TO is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VXM-B.TO is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities.