CMNWX vs. PLTHX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) and PLTHX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund) are both mutual funds - CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal, while PLTHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX returned 15.46%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for PLTHX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CMNWX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PLTHX.

Performance

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX has outperformed PLTHX with an annualized return of 15.46%, while PLTHX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.99% annualized return.

CMNWX

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 9.13%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: 23.09%
• 5Y*: 14.51%
• 10Y*: 15.46%

PLTHX

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	9.93%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	20.64%
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund	10.78%	19.91%	17.18%	20.28%	-18.52%	20.05%	16.11%	26.46%	-9.93%	21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNWX and PLTHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014	0.95

The correlation between CMNWX and PLTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMNWX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 50
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PLTHX

PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 64
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMNWX	PLTHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.27	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	3.16	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.15	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.86	14.46	-1.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the PLTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNWX and PLTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMNWX	PLTHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.27	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.66	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.75	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.69	+0.03

Drawdowns

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, which is greater than PLTHX's maximum drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and PLTHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMNWX	PLTHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.43%	-33.26%	-17.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-8.60%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.54%	-16.64%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-25.49%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.26%	-33.26%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-0.83%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.95%	-4.81%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.87%	+0.03%

Volatility

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) is 3.00%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that CMNWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMNWX	PLTHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	3.54%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	9.49%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	11.96%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	15.50%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.19%	15.97%	+1.22%

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMNWX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison

CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than PLTHX's 3.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	7.96%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund	3.94%	4.37%	4.30%	2.76%	7.91%	3.84%	2.91%	3.67%	3.47%	2.37%	2.20%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMNWX and PLTHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CMNWX and PLTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CMNWX or PLTHX?

PLTHX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to CMNWX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNWX dropped -50.43% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.