CMMVX vs. MHELX
CMMVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund) and MHELX (MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, CMMVX returned 13.90%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for MHELX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMMVX charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MHELX.
Performance
CMMVX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMMVX achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return.
CMMVX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MHELX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 20.19%
- 1Y
- 39.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
CMMVX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 7.72% | 13.09% | 12.44% | 16.24% | -15.57% | 2.78% |
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund | 17.65% | 3.45% | 12.51% | 16.30% | -20.27% | 4.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMMVX and MHELX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CMMVX and MHELX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMMVX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank
CMMVX
MHELX
CMMVX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMMVX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 2.06 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 2.92 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 4.64 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 15.69 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMMVX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.06 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.33 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
CMMVX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMMVX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMMVX and MHELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMMVX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.58% | -61.24% | +40.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -8.52% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.51% | -30.81% | +19.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.60% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -12.93% | +7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 2.51% | -1.08% |
Volatility
CMMVX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) is 2.38%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that CMMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMMVX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 4.53% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.26% | 15.24% | -8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 19.23% | -11.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 21.00% | -10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 20.97% | -10.28% |
CMMVX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMMVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMMVX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison
CMMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than MHELX's 6.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 3.42% | 3.68% | 3.00% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund | 6.13% | 0.00% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 14.45% | 5.03% | 2.70% | 6.13% | 0.00% | 5.17% | 5.51% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMMVX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to CMMVX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMMVX dropped -20.58% vs MHELX's -61.24%.
CMMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMMVX and MHELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer