PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMMVX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMMVX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 8.40% return.


CMMVX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.57%
YTD
7.46%
6M
8.03%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
10Y*

FSIRX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.40%
6M
9.13%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
5.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMMVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund
7.46%13.09%12.44%16.24%-15.57%2.78%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
8.40%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CMMVX and FSIRX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between CMMVX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMMVX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMMVX
CMMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CMMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CMMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMMVXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

3.54

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

4.97

-1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.70

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

8.09

-5.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.73

32.05

-19.32

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMMVX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMMVXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

3.54

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.60

+0.09

Drawdowns

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMMVX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMMVX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMMVXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.58%

-33.39%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-2.05%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.51%

-5.81%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.04%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-4.17%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

0.52%

+0.91%

Volatility

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.29%. This indicates that CMMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMMVXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

1.29%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.27%

3.77%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.02%

4.76%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.69%

6.92%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.69%

6.74%

+3.95%

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMMVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMMVX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

CMMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than FSIRX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMMVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund
3.43%3.68%3.00%2.31%1.76%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.20%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMMVX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMMVX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to FSIRX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMMVX dropped -20.58% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMMVX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer