PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMMVX vs. DMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMMVX vs. DMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMMVX vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CMMVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund
-3.47%13.09%12.44%16.24%-14.32%
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
-5.96%16.89%41.06%-3.81%-15.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMMVX achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -5.96% return.


CMMVX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
-3.47%
6M
-1.88%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
10Y*

DMA

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
-5.96%
6M
0.97%
1Y
8.74%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMMVX vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMMVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DMA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CMMVX vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMMVX
CMMVX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CMMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CMMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DMA
DMA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMMVX vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMMVXDMADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.49

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

0.88

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.61

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.44

2.39

+3.05

CMMVX vs. DMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the DMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMMVX and DMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMMVXDMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.49

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.23

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between CMMVX and DMA is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CMMVX vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison

CMMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than DMA's 13.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CMMVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund
3.81%3.68%3.00%2.31%1.76%0.08%
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
13.69%9.42%3.83%5.22%10.14%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMMVX vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMMVX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, smaller than the maximum DMA drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMMVX and DMA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMMVXDMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.58%

-38.85%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.06%

-12.71%

+4.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-7.64%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-11.26%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.38%

-1.66%

Volatility

CMMVX vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) is 3.25%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that CMMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMMVXDMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

5.19%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

8.94%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

17.78%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.73%

24.34%

-13.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.73%

24.34%

-13.61%