PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMLIX vs. CSMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMLIX achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than CSMCX's 18.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMLIX having a 16.75% annualized return and CSMCX not far ahead at 17.39%.


CMLIX

1D
-1.08%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
4.70%
6M
3.70%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
16.75%

CSMCX

1D
-0.34%
1M
8.19%
YTD
18.84%
6M
15.45%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMLIX
Congress Large Cap Growth Fund
4.70%12.70%27.69%32.36%-24.47%25.63%31.54%45.96%0.19%27.01%
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
18.84%8.37%18.65%20.27%-26.21%39.30%39.11%36.12%2.51%22.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CMLIX and CSMCX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2010

0.80

The correlation between CMLIX and CSMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMLIX vs. CSMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMLIX
CMLIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CMLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CMLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMCX
CSMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CSMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMLIXCSMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.25

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.91

7.26

-2.35

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the CSMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMLIX and CSMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMLIX drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, smaller than the maximum CSMCX drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMLIX and CSMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMLIXCSMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.32%

-56.20%

+25.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-13.63%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-26.10%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.32%

-33.44%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.32%

-33.44%

+3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-0.34%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-9.38%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

4.22%

-0.62%

Volatility

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) is 5.26%, while Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that CMLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMLIXCSMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

6.23%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

16.23%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

21.67%

-7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

22.68%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

22.49%

-2.23%

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMLIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMCX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMLIX vs. CSMCX - Dividend Comparison

CMLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than CSMCX's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMLIX
Congress Large Cap Growth Fund
6.95%7.28%11.88%3.55%4.70%10.27%8.46%14.97%6.31%1.89%1.22%3.17%
CSMCX
Congress Small Cap Growth Fund
1.97%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.57%7.05%16.14%10.04%11.48%0.00%27.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMLIX and CSMCX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSMCX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to CMLIX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMLIX dropped -30.32% vs CSMCX's -56.20%.

CSMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMLIX and CSMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer