PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMIUX vs. CMEUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMIUX achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than CMEUX's 12.07% return.


CMIUX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.94%
YTD
8.79%
6M
12.09%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*

CMEUX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.50%
YTD
12.07%
6M
11.78%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMIUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund
8.79%33.36%2.63%20.07%-12.61%19.72%9.26%4.62%
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
12.07%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CMIUX and CMEUX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.72

The correlation between CMIUX and CMEUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMIUX vs. CMEUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMIUX
CMIUX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CMIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CMIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMIUXCMEUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.65

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

3.58

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.40

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.67

14.99

-8.32

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the CMEUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMIUX and CMEUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMIUXCMEUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.65

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.81

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.88

-0.30

Drawdowns

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMIUX drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than CMEUX's maximum drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMIUX and CMEUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMIUXCMEUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-28.39%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-9.51%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.30%

-19.91%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

-25.61%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

0.00%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-5.34%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.15%

+1.03%

Volatility

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) at 2.79%. This indicates that CMIUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMEUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMIUXCMEUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

2.79%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

9.21%

+3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

12.19%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

17.94%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

19.96%

-0.23%

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMIUX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than CMEUX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMIUX vs. CMEUX - Dividend Comparison

CMIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than CMEUX's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.90%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%
CMIUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund
2.41%2.62%2.96%2.25%2.98%1.93%1.81%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMIUX and CMEUX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMIUX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to CMEUX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMIUX dropped -36.83% vs CMEUX's -28.39%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMIUX and CMEUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer