CMIUX vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
CMIUX is managed by Six Circles. It was launched on Apr 9, 2019. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
CMIUX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMIUX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMIUX Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund | 0.72% | 33.36% | 2.63% | 20.07% | -12.61% | 19.72% | 9.26% | 4.62% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 4.58% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 7.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMIUX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 4.58% return.
CMIUX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMIUX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMIUX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CMIUX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
CMIUX
SCHF
CMIUX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMIUX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.76 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 2.40 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.75 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 10.59 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMIUX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.76 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.40 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMIUX and SCHF is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMIUX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
CMIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than SCHF's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMIUX Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund | 2.60% | 2.62% | 2.96% | 2.25% | 2.98% | 1.93% | 1.81% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
CMIUX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMIUX drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMIUX and SCHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMIUX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -34.87% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -11.48% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.49% | -29.14% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -7.16% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -7.44% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.98% | +0.04% |
Volatility
CMIUX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 7.86% and 7.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMIUX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 7.94% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 11.79% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 17.75% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 16.14% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 17.09% | +2.65% |