PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMI vs. EIRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMI vs. EIRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMI achieves a 33.28% return, which is significantly higher than EIRRX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CMI has outperformed EIRRX with an annualized return of 22.08%, while EIRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.


CMI

1D
0.38%
1M
2.48%
6M
23.23%
YTD
33.28%
1Y
102.70%
3Y*
41.10%
5Y*
25.64%
10Y*
22.08%

EIRRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.08%
6M
1.07%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMI vs. EIRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMI
Cummins Inc.
33.28%49.36%48.92%1.72%14.09%-1.68%30.50%38.04%-22.06%32.74%
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
1.27%4.63%5.65%6.33%-3.08%7.84%5.25%5.60%-0.15%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CMI and EIRRX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMI vs. EIRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMI
CMI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

EIRRX
EIRRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EIRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMI vs. EIRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMIEIRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.73

3.21

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.64

10.45

+12.19

CMI vs. EIRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the EIRRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMI and EIRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMI vs. EIRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMI drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, which is greater than EIRRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMI and EIRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMIEIRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.66%

-10.27%

-65.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.23%

-0.89%

-14.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

-1.67%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-6.22%

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.05%

-10.27%

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.10%

-0.47%

-6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-0.99%

-21.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

0.27%

+4.25%

Volatility

CMI vs. EIRRX - Volatility Comparison

Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) at 0.67%. This indicates that CMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMIEIRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.54%

0.67%

+13.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.13%

1.32%

+28.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.47%

1.65%

+33.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.59%

2.84%

+25.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

2.77%

+25.63%

Dividends

CMI vs. EIRRX - Dividend Comparison

CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EIRRX's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMI
Cummins Inc.
1.18%1.50%2.01%2.71%2.49%2.57%2.33%2.74%3.32%2.38%2.93%3.99%
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
5.28%3.57%4.08%4.50%5.07%3.54%2.21%2.66%2.91%2.13%2.24%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMI and EIRRX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMI has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to EIRRX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMI dropped -75.66% vs EIRRX's -10.27%.

CMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMI and EIRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer