PortfoliosLab logo
CMI vs. WAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMI and WAT is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CMI vs. WAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Waters Corporation (WAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMI:

0.49

WAT:

-0.10

Sortino Ratio

CMI:

0.87

WAT:

0.23

Omega Ratio

CMI:

1.11

WAT:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

CMI:

0.46

WAT:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

CMI:

1.38

WAT:

-0.14

Ulcer Index

CMI:

10.07%

WAT:

11.26%

Daily Std Dev

CMI:

31.20%

WAT:

38.06%

Max Drawdown

CMI:

-75.66%

WAT:

-80.12%

Current Drawdown

CMI:

-13.38%

WAT:

-18.68%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMI:

$46.09B

WAT:

$21.36B

EPS

CMI:

$20.30

WAT:

$11.04

PE Ratio

CMI:

16.48

WAT:

32.52

PEG Ratio

CMI:

2.68

WAT:

2.42

PS Ratio

CMI:

1.36

WAT:

7.16

PB Ratio

CMI:

4.22

WAT:

11.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMI:

$33.87B

WAT:

$2.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMI:

$8.52B

WAT:

$1.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMI:

$4.90B

WAT:

$995.26M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMI achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly higher than WAT's -6.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CMI has outperformed WAT with an annualized return of 11.93%, while WAT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.


CMI

YTD

-4.07%

1M

15.34%

6M

-8.26%

1Y

15.21%

5Y*

19.49%

10Y*

11.93%

WAT

YTD

-6.90%

1M

3.48%

6M

-10.44%

1Y

-3.79%

5Y*

14.18%

10Y*

10.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMI vs. WAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMI is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMI is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMI is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMI is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMI is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMI is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

WAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAT is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAT is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAT is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAT is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAT is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMI vs. WAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Waters Corporation (WAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the WAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMI and WAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMI vs. WAT - Dividend Comparison

CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMI
Cummins Inc.
2.15%2.01%2.71%2.49%2.57%2.33%2.74%3.32%2.38%2.93%3.99%1.95%
WAT
Waters Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMI vs. WAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMI drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum WAT drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMI and WAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMI vs. WAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cummins Inc. (CMI) is 9.93%, while Waters Corporation (WAT) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that CMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CMI vs. WAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cummins Inc. and Waters Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
8.17B
661.71M
(CMI) Total Revenue
(WAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMI vs. WAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cummins Inc. and Waters Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
26.4%
74.5%
(CMI) Gross Margin
(WAT) Gross Margin
CMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cummins Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.16B and revenue of 8.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.

WAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waters Corporation reported a gross profit of 493.15M and revenue of 661.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.5%.

CMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cummins Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 8.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

WAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waters Corporation reported an operating income of 151.75M and revenue of 661.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.9%.

CMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cummins Inc. reported a net income of 824.00M and revenue of 8.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

WAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waters Corporation reported a net income of 121.38M and revenue of 661.71M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.