PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMI vs. WAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CMIWAT
YTD Return54.62%14.42%
1Y Return66.81%41.13%
3Y Return (Ann)18.67%2.92%
5Y Return (Ann)17.54%11.66%
10Y Return (Ann)12.79%12.88%
Sharpe Ratio2.771.33
Sortino Ratio3.832.30
Omega Ratio1.481.28
Calmar Ratio4.471.18
Martin Ratio15.884.96
Ulcer Index4.24%9.20%
Daily Std Dev24.28%34.36%
Max Drawdown-75.66%-80.12%
Current Drawdown-0.71%-11.30%

Fundamentals


CMIWAT
Market Cap$48.71B$22.91B
EPS$15.27$10.47
PE Ratio23.2536.85
PEG Ratio0.713.58
Total Revenue (TTM)$34.20B$2.91B
Gross Profit (TTM)$8.41B$1.72B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.96B$786.64M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CMI and WAT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CMI vs. WAT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CMI achieves a 54.62% return, which is significantly higher than WAT's 14.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMI having a 12.79% annualized return and WAT not far ahead at 12.88%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.87%
4.50%
CMI
WAT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMI vs. WAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Waters Corporation (WAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMI, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.77
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMI, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CMI, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMI, currently valued at 4.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CMI, currently valued at 15.88, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.88
WAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WAT, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WAT, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WAT, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WAT, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WAT, currently valued at 4.96, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.96

CMI vs. WAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the WAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMI and WAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.77
1.33
CMI
WAT

Dividends

CMI vs. WAT - Dividend Comparison

CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CMI
Cummins Inc.
1.89%2.71%2.49%2.57%2.33%2.74%3.32%2.38%2.93%3.99%1.95%1.60%
WAT
Waters Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMI vs. WAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMI drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum WAT drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMI and WAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.71%
-11.30%
CMI
WAT

Volatility

CMI vs. WAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cummins Inc. (CMI) is 9.69%, while Waters Corporation (WAT) has a volatility of 19.19%. This indicates that CMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.69%
19.19%
CMI
WAT

Financials

CMI vs. WAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cummins Inc. and Waters Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items