CMI vs. WAT

In the year-to-date period, CMI achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than WAT's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CMI has underperformed WAT with an annualized return of 12.80%, while WAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Waters Corporation (WAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the WAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMI and WAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while WAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CMI drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum WAT drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMI and WAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cummins Inc. (CMI) is 5.37%, while Waters Corporation (WAT) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that CMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cummins Inc. and Waters Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.