CMGUX vs. CMTFX
CMGUX (Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund) and CMTFX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CMGUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Columbia, while CMTFX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, CMGUX returned 2.69%/yr vs 25.07%/yr for CMTFX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. CMGUX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for CMTFX.
Performance
CMGUX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGUX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than CMTFX's 30.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CMGUX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 2.69%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.07% annualized return.
CMGUX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
CMTFX
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- 7.75%
- YTD
- 30.99%
- 6M
- 30.90%
- 1Y
- 59.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 25.07%
CMGUX vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGUX Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 1.58% | 4.89% | 5.31% | 5.88% | 0.79% | 0.17% | 1.78% | 2.99% | 1.90% | 1.36% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 30.99% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -34.63% | 23.04% | 49.65% | 44.21% | -1.26% | 43.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGUX and CMTFX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2004 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGUX vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank
CMGUX
CMTFX
CMGUX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMGUX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.49 | 1.41 | +3.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.44 | 4.07 | +17.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 80.65 | 14.50 | +66.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMGUX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGUX drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, smaller than the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGUX and CMTFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGUX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -68.28% | +65.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.22% | -14.35% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.32% | -26.63% | +26.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.95% | -39.42% | +38.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.09% | -39.42% | +36.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.91% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -16.27% | +16.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 4.02% | -3.96% |
Volatility
CMGUX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) is 0.37%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that CMGUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGUX | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | 11.74% | -11.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.97% | 19.53% | -18.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39% | 23.43% | -22.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 26.37% | -25.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.11% | 25.05% | -23.94% |
CMGUX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGUX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison
CMGUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than CMTFX's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGUX Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 4.39% | 4.65% | 4.07% | 3.46% | 1.34% | 0.61% | 1.53% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.24% | 0.87% | 0.50% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 2.36% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGUX and CMTFX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMTFX has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to CMGUX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMGUX dropped -3.09% vs CMTFX's -68.28%.
CMGUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMGUX and CMTFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer