PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMGUX vs. BBSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) and BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMGUX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than BBSOX's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CMGUX has outperformed BBSOX with an annualized return of 2.69%, while BBSOX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.48% annualized return.


CMGUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.99%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
2.69%

BBSOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMGUX
Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund
1.58%4.89%5.31%5.88%0.79%0.17%1.78%2.99%1.90%1.36%
BBSOX
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund
1.49%4.74%5.36%4.36%0.60%-0.10%1.54%3.01%1.96%1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CMGUX and BBSOX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMGUX vs. BBSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMGUX
CMGUX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CMGUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMGUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMGUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CMGUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMGUX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSOX
BBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) and BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMGUXBBSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.99

4.23

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.44

21.50

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

83.64

70.26

+13.38

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMGUX Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is comparable to the BBSOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMGUX and BBSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMGUXBBSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

3.20

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.85

2.63

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.43

2.42

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

2.24

-0.42

Drawdowns

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMGUX drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, which is greater than BBSOX's maximum drawdown of -1.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGUX and BBSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMGUXBBSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-1.59%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.22%

-0.20%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.32%

-0.30%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.95%

-1.00%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.09%

-1.59%

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-0.08%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.06%

0.00%

Volatility

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) is 0.37%, while BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) has a volatility of 0.40%. This indicates that CMGUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMGUXBBSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.40%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

0.88%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40%

1.33%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.28%

1.25%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.11%

1.03%

+0.08%

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMGUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BBSOX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMGUX vs. BBSOX - Dividend Comparison

CMGUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than BBSOX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSOX
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund
4.25%4.43%5.01%3.35%1.29%0.30%1.13%2.56%2.24%1.17%1.03%0.62%
CMGUX
Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund
4.39%4.65%4.07%3.46%1.34%0.61%1.53%2.50%1.99%1.24%0.87%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMGUX and BBSOX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to CMGUX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMGUX dropped -3.09% vs BBSOX's -1.59%.

CMGUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMGUX and BBSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer