CMGUX vs. TMPFX
CMGUX (Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund) and TMPFX (Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CMGUX returned 3.71%/yr vs 2.81%/yr for TMPFX. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CMGUX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TMPFX.
Performance
CMGUX vs. TMPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGUX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than TMPFX's 2.13% return.
CMGUX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.09%
TMPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CMGUX vs. TMPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGUX Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 1.92% | 4.89% | 5.31% | 5.88% | 0.79% | 0.17% | 1.78% | 2.99% | 1.90% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 2.13% | 3.71% | 4.26% | 3.90% | 0.51% | -0.91% | -0.60% | 0.30% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGUX and TMPFX is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2018 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGUX vs. TMPFX — Risk / Return Rank
CMGUX
TMPFX
CMGUX vs. TMPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) and Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMGUX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.89 | 13.22 | -9.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.68 | 37.35 | -16.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 71.95 | 296.96 | -225.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMGUX vs. TMPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGUX drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, smaller than the maximum TMPFX drawdown of -3.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGUX and TMPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGUX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -3.52% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.22% | -0.10% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.32% | -3.52% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.95% | -3.52% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -0.64% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.01% | +0.05% |
Volatility
CMGUX vs. TMPFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) is 0.22%, while Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) has a volatility of 0.26%. This indicates that CMGUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGUX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 0.26% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.96% | 0.47% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39% | 0.61% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 2.34% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.12% | 1.80% | -0.68% |
CMGUX vs. TMPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TMPFX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGUX vs. TMPFX - Dividend Comparison
CMGUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than TMPFX's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGUX Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 3.95% | 4.65% | 4.07% | 3.46% | 1.34% | 0.61% | 1.53% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.24% | 0.87% | 0.50% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 3.73% | 3.81% | 4.15% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGUX and TMPFX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMPFX has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to CMGUX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMGUX dropped -3.09% vs TMPFX's -3.52%.
TMPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.13 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMGUX and TMPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer