CMGIX vs. WFSPX
CMGIX (BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K) are both mutual funds - CMGIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, CMGIX returned 12.94%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for WFSPX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMGIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.
Performance
CMGIX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGIX achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CMGIX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 12.94%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.51% annualized return.
CMGIX
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 6.92%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
WFSPX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.51%
CMGIX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 9.96% | 0.49% | 12.44% | 28.24% | -37.36% | 14.51% | 46.13% | 36.19% | 2.88% | 34.59% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K | 8.19% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGIX and WFSPX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1996 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CMGIX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGIX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
CMGIX
WFSPX
CMGIX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMGIX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 2.67 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 11.99 | -10.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMGIX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, which is greater than WFSPX's maximum drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGIX and WFSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGIX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -58.21% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -8.90% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.77% | -18.74% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.96% | -24.51% | -21.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.96% | -33.74% | -12.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -3.13% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.62% | -12.76% | -15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 1.98% | +2.83% |
Volatility
CMGIX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) at 4.90%. This indicates that CMGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGIX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 4.90% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 9.93% | +8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 12.56% | +9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 16.98% | +8.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 18.04% | +5.47% |
CMGIX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGIX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
CMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.28%, more than WFSPX's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 19.28% | 21.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 4.72% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 2.57% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGIX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMGIX has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to WFSPX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMGIX dropped -73.85% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.
WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMGIX and WFSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer