CMGIX vs. MMGPX
CMGIX (BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CMGIX returned 0.90%/yr vs -7.54%/yr for MMGPX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMGIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
CMGIX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGIX achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.47% return.
CMGIX
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 6.92%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
MMGPX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -6.19%
- 1Y
- -8.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- -7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CMGIX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 9.96% | 0.49% | 12.44% | 28.24% | -37.36% | 14.51% | 46.13% | 36.19% | 2.88% | 26.89% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.47% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGIX and MMGPX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CMGIX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGIX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
CMGIX
MMGPX
CMGIX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMGIX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.98 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | -0.24 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | -0.49 | +2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMGIX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, roughly equal to the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGIX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGIX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -75.38% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -27.79% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.77% | -29.27% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.96% | -72.70% | +26.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -41.72% | +34.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.62% | -30.29% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 13.66% | -8.85% |
Volatility
CMGIX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) is 8.10%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that CMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGIX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 9.72% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 21.72% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 28.55% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 39.82% | -14.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 35.22% | -11.71% |
CMGIX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGIX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
CMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.28%, more than MMGPX's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 19.28% | 21.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 4.72% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 2.57% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGIX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to CMGIX (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMGIX dropped -73.85% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
CMGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMGIX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer